So, here we are in the age of digital art and AI-generated masterpieces. You can now make a painting without even dirtying your hands. Heck, you don’t even need hands! Just the mind and a machine. Kinda like a telepathic artist, if you will. Now that’s something Picasso would have raised an eyebrow at!
But there’s a twist. Amid all this high-tech wizardry, physical artwork is prone to making a comeback. You know, the kind where you can actually feel the brush strokes and leave greasy fingerprints on.
Remember when we were kids and mom told us not to touch anything at the store? Well, in the art world, touching (well, metaphorically) is part of the game. You engage with it, you experience it with all your senses. It’s like a good homemade meal.
And here’s a funny thing: these physical artworks are like those limited-edition action figures that become more valuable because they’re hard to find. They’re one of a kind. You can’t just Ctrl+C and Ctrl+V a painting. So, in a world where you can duplicate digital files faster than rabbits reproduce, these physical artworks stand ground like a stubborn mule.
Well, sort of. Either they are worthy or they are worthless.
I realize that photographs are different. They’ve been processed by a machine and the physical print is often an afterthought, even though printing is an art form in itself. I find a beautiful quality print (such as the ones we create here at Milostate) can actually make or break a good picture.
Now, here’s a riddle for you: If an AI paints a tree in an empty forest, who is the artist? Deep, huh? This is the paradox we’re facing today. When an AI creates art, who gets the credit? The AI for painting it or the user for giving the command? It’s like asking who makes the better pasta: the chef or the pasta machine.
But let’s not get too tangled up in the spaghetti of philosophical questions. The point is, while AI has been shaking things up, there’s something about physical art that’s just… timeless. It must have something to do with the human touch, the emotion, the story that a machine can’t replicate. Yet.
Think of it like this: For the time being, AI can sing a song with perfect pitch, but can it feel the blues? I guess not. Physical art is here to stay, with all its rough edges, coffee stains, and the occasional pubic hair hair stuck in the paint. It’s not just about looking, but also feeling. Physical art is sexy. And no amount of technology can fully replace that. Yet.
In this digital day and age, physical art is like a breath of fresh air. It’s like going outside after binge-watching a series on your couch all day. Suddenly, you appreciate the warmth of the sun, the smell of the grass, the chirping of the birds. So, in the end, even as AI continues to make waves, the allure of physical art is only getting stronger.
The future of art? It’s like a dance, a tango between the algorithm and the artist, the digital and the physical. And boy, what a dance it will be!
Make sure to study the image below in detail. A picture is worth a thousand words.
Image 1. Generated using Midjourney. Zoom in to see the wonderful details of the bodies. I particularly enjoy the faces and genitals.
Images below were generated using the same algorithm, using sticks and stones, fragile bones, charcoal and dust and very large bust.
Chat GPT version of the above article.
“In an age of digital art and AI-generated imagery, the importance of tangible, physical artwork is becoming more apparent. Despite the versatility and astounding magical beauty of digital art, it obviously lacks the tactile and multi-sensory experience offered by physical objects. The process of creating physical art – from the texture of brush strokes to the use of traditional processes – contributes to its unique value. Furthermore, in a world filled with duplicable digital files, physical artworks offer permanence and scarcity, enhancing their value to collectors and art enthusiasts. As we continue to embrace AI and digital tools, the allure of tangible, physical art only grows stronger.”
The digital revolution, specifically artificial intelligence (AI), has undeniably made a profound impact on the art world. From creating new, and often astounding, artwork to enhancing existing works, AI offers opportunities and challenges that are reshaping the landscape of artistic creation, especially with tools like Midjourney and Stable Difusion. These incredible AI-based tool allow users to generate original images of just about anything they can imagine in any style.
Artificial Intelligence in Art
AI tools like Midjourney are introducing a new approach to art creation, and essentially democratize the art-making process, allowing anyone with an idea to generate an original image. This tool’s algorithm learns from a multitude of artistic styles and visual data, enabling it to create new works based on the user’s description.
Implications on the Art World
As the saying goes, “Art imitates life,” and with AI, the art world is set to mirror the rapid technological changes in our society. The capacity to generate any imagined image could lead to an exponential increase in the number of “art pieces” produced. For those that consider art to be an image, rather than an object, this will challenge the traditional understanding of art scarcity, which has historically added to the value of an artwork.
Simultaneously, AI-generated art raises questions about authorship and originality. When an AI creates an artwork, who is the artist? The AI for creating it or the user who provided the idea and parameters? This ethical conundrum is obviously something that the art world will need to grapple with as AI becomes more integrated into artistic processes.
Impacts on Artists & Graphic Designers
For artists and graphic designers, the advent of AI tools can be both a boon and a challenge. On one hand, it could free them from repetitive tasks, giving them more time to focus on conceptual and critical thinking. It may also inspire new techniques and styles that would not be possible with traditional methods.
On the other hand, AI might also pose a threat to the livelihood of artists and graphic designers. As AI tools become more sophisticated and accessible, the demand for manual artistic skills might decrease. However, it’s essential to remember that while AI can replicate styles and techniques, it cannot replace the human emotions, experiences, and intentions that often drive art.
As we look to the future, the interplay of AI and art will undoubtedly continue to evolve. The challenge lies in finding a balance between leveraging AI’s capabilities while maintaining the essence of human creativity that is at the heart of all art forms.
In the evolving world of art, it’s noteworthy that as AI tools, such as Midjourney, make it possible to create or generate endless imagery, the value of physical objects will potentially escalate. In an era of digitalization, the value proposition of physical, tangible artifacts created with actual materials, such as paint or charcoal, can gain a new level of appreciation.
Physicality & Tangibility
While the convenience and versatility of digital art and AI-generated imagery are undeniable, they don’t offer the tactile experience that comes with a physical object. This aspect, the physicality and tangibility, is something that AI-generated imagery cannot replicate. A physical painting, for instance, carries the weight of its materials, the texture of the brush strokes, and the physical presence that allows viewers to engage with it in a three-dimensional space.
Furthermore, the research on physical objects’ social relationships suggests that we have complex interactions with physical objects that go beyond simple observation [1]. We live in a physical world and interact with it through our senses. Physical objects, including art pieces, engage multiple senses, offering a more immersive experience that can’t be fully mimicked by digital counterparts.
Firstly, physical objects engage our senses in a holistic manner. For instance, when you view a physical artwork, you don’t just see the colors and shapes, but you also perceive the texture of the canvas or the thickness of the paint, and sometimes even smell the materials used. You can walk around a sculpture and see it from different angles, or touch a piece of pottery to feel its smoothness or roughness. These multi-sensory experiences add depth to our interaction with the artwork, making it more immersive and meaningful.
Secondly, the physical presence of objects can evoke stronger emotional responses. According to research in psychology, physical objects can serve as extensions of our identities, or they can trigger memories and emotions. For example, holding a family heirloom or a childhood toy can elicit feelings of nostalgia, joy, or melancholy. Similarly, a physical artwork can stir powerful emotions, depending on the viewer’s personal interpretation and connection to the piece.
Thirdly, physical objects have a social dimension. They exist in a shared physical space, and they can be seen, touched, or discussed by multiple people. This allows for shared experiences, discussions, and social interactions that are not possible with digital counterparts. For example, visiting a museum or an art gallery is not just about viewing the artworks, but also about sharing the experience with other visitors, discussing the artworks, and participating in a social event.
Lastly, the physicality of objects also means that they exist within the constraints and possibilities of the physical world. They can be affected by time, weather, or accidents. They can age, deteriorate, or get damaged. This vulnerability and impermanence of physical objects add another layer to our appreciation of them. It reminds us of the passage of time, the fragility of beauty, and the preciousness of things that cannot last forever.
In contrast, digital counterparts can only offer visual and auditory experiences, and they lack the physical, emotional, and social dimensions of interaction. They exist in virtual spaces, and they are not bound by the same physical laws. While digital art can offer its own unique advantages, such as convenience, versatility, and the ability to reach a global audience, it cannot fully mimic the multi-sensory, emotional, and social experiences offered by physical artworks.
Moreover, the process of creating physical art is steeped in human tradition, skill, and creativity, which lends a unique value to these pieces. Each physical artwork is a testament to the artist’s skill, effort, and time, which are all factors that can significantly contribute to the perceived and actual value of the artwork.
Finally, in a world inundated with digital images, physical artworks can offer a sense of permanence and stability. As opposed to digital files that can be duplicated endlessly without any loss of quality, a physical artwork is one-of-a-kind. This scarcity can significantly increase its value in the eyes of collectors and art enthusiasts.
While the rise of AI and digital tools in art creation is an exciting development, it is likely to result in an increased appreciation for physical artworks, emphasizing the enduring allure and value of tangible, physical art in our increasingly digital world.
Chat GPT suggested the following titles for the article:
- “The Enduring Allure of Physical Art in the Age of AI Imagery”
- “Tangible vs. Digital: The Rising Value of Physical Artifacts in an AI-Generated World”
- “The Unreplicable Charm: Why Physical Art Remains Valuable Amid Endless Digital Imagery”
- “The New Renaissance: How AI Might Boost the Value of Traditional Artwork”
- “Beyond Pixels: The Rising Worth of Physical Art in the Digital Age”
ABOUT the AUTHOR
He may or may not be conscious.
In the realm of thought,
Awake or asleep, unsure,
Mystery unfolds.